Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>]

El Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:27:49 +0900
flux <flux AT sourcemage.org> escribió:
<...> 
> I'd rather like to know what texlinks is doing and perhaps we should
> do that ourselves. If all it's doing is setting up symlinks, why does
> there need to be an entirely separate binary for this? Why not just
> ln -s? This seems rather fishy. However, we definitely need to fix
> the INSTALL to do the right thing. I also have a feeling that this
> only affects latex/pdflatex (and possibly tex), but I'm not so sure
> about this. I'm fairly sure, though, that this doesn't affect context
> (which has it's own wrappers).

It was affecting ConTeXt on my system. In fact, it affected almost all
binaries (which I guess were wrappers).

I've tried a newer version and it looked a lot less broken, so I
upgraded the spell. It's missing some bits, but a lot better.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature