Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc
  • Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 10:54:47 -0600

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 06:29:06 +0100
Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz> wrote:

> > http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13873
> > http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15559
>
> I tested devel sorcery, seems works like a charm (installwatch part,
> there is a problem with PAGER patch).
>
> In devel-xorg-modular git branch I updated installwatch to 2010-12-12
> and coreutils to 8.8. Please test on your test boxes. If you cast -c
> e2fsprogs you should be able to see mkfs.extX by
>
> $ gaze install e2fsprogs|grep mkfs
> /sbin/mkfs.ext2
> /sbin/mkfs.ext3
> /sbin/mkfs.ext4
>
>
> Of course you can inspect files created in /var/cache/sorcery, compare
> with previous version created by previous sorcery and previous
> installwatch.
>

I have been testing with the update to install watch and the changes to
make it work with stable sorcery. So far everything is working great
with coreutils 8.9.

My plan is to integrate these changes to test today.

George Sherwood
Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk0oltcACgkQkVJnfkgKg625gACfUpqt7SsyPC9rHCXhf+bBpXRm
wZIAn01FOpM1eOkdxXgExboWTlom5uAJ
=vrru
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  • Re: [SM-Discuss] coreutils vs glibc, George Sherwood, 01/08/2011

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page