Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs-lisp section

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs-lisp section
  • Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 01:22:01 -0200

El Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:24:41 +0100 (CET)
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik <ruskie AT codemages.net> escribió:
> :2010-12-08T22:32:flux:
>
> > Organizational consistency is of course the only reason to move
> > them, and it's also the very reason I am citing. However, I'm in
> > charge of Cauldron, not the Grimoire, so I will defer to others,
> > but I do like consistency. :)
>
> The general consensus last I checked was that a section should have
> atleast 15 spells to be on it's own. It should generally solve a
> common code issue though more than not we tend to also group by some
> common toolkit or something.
>
> Regards

So, guys, what do you think about the current status? would it not be a
lot of duplication to have those spells on other branch?

And it's only the ones I use... the majority of emacs packages come
in that way.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature



  • Re: [SM-Discuss] emacs-lisp section, Ismael Luceno, 01/06/2011

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page