sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] Xorg font path transition... is this an issue that needs integration to stable?
- From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Xorg font path transition... is this an issue that needs integration to stable?
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:11:48 +0100
Hi folks...
after having several old-ish apps (Motif, xfontsel... stuff that needs X11
core fonts) broken with their fonts after updating my SMGL system, I figured
out that it's the (incomplete) transition from /usr/lib/X11/fonts to
/usr/share/fonts/X11.
This caused a lot of fonts not being found anymore by my X server and thusly
had forced me to think about getting my favourite text editor font back (yes,
for programming you cannot beat a good bitmap font).
Long story short: I fixed up xorg-server to look into /usr/share/fonts/X11 by
default (important when you got no xorg.conf at all) and also several spells
on xorg-fonts that still installed to the old location. Seems like upstream
people didn't bother to update all font packages in that respect.
I am talking about the commits leading to
c8d80144d164621665fa0a7f183b389d556deaac... Now, I wonder: Does this affect
current stable grimoire? And if it does, is this issue demanding an
integration or not? Some folks on IRC weren't particulary bothered since
minimal font to get Xorg running at all is built-in and modern programs don't
need core X fonts.
Opinions?
Thomas.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Xorg font path transition... is this an issue that needs integration to stable?,
Thomas Orgis, 12/16/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg font path transition... is this an issue that needs integration to stable?, Eric Sandall, 12/16/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.