sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell
- From: Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik <ruskie AT codemages.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:30:19 +0200 (CEST)
> Sounds good for future updates. This means we have an upgrade issue
> though, as going from split spells to combined spell broke due to this
> dependency cycle. This needs to be resolved before it can go to test
> grimoire.
Another issue I would like to stuff someplace is /lib64
Do we really need to bother with supporting both instead of just putting
things into /lib and be done with.
This would reduce the need to handle specs files in the gcc spell.
Considering we overwrite this everywhere else we should do it for the
loader as well:
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 to /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
And be done with it.
--
Andraž ruskie Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games/Xorg grimoire guru
Re-Alpine Coordinator http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine/
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to say it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/22/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Peng Chang (Charles), 07/22/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 07/23/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 07/23/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Peng Chang (Charles), 07/23/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/23/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 07/23/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Peng Chang (Charles), 07/23/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, flux, 07/23/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Eric Sandall, 07/24/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 07/23/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 07/24/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Ethan Grammatikidis, 07/24/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Seth Alan Woolley, 07/24/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/25/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Thomas Orgis, 07/25/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/22/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: combining all gcc frontends into a single spell, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 07/20/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.