Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] In what way is our gfortran install broken?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] In what way is our gfortran install broken?
  • Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:13:28 +0200

Am Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:32:09 +0200
schrieb Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>:

> The spec file is there so that the gcc frontend knows how to compile
> fortran programs (by calling gfortran). This is the same for all split
> gcc spells. In a normal setup where the whole suite is compiled at once,
> the specfile is built at compiletime including all that information.

Well, but obviously _something_ is wrong with our install in that area...
or are you able to compile a .f95 source file without forcing -xf95?
Does automatic preprocessing work for a .F90 file?

(I am aware of not very many people actually using gfortran...)


Alrighty then,

Thomas.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page