sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] In what way is our gfortran install broken?
- From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] In what way is our gfortran install broken?
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:05:24 +0200
Does someone (possibly somone who hacked our fortran spell in the past...)
have some remarks about the outcome of this one:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40583
? I am fairly certain that the current spell (well, fortran 4.3.3) installed
/usr/bin/gfortran (the "driver"?)...
Are we missing something else?
Also, do we really need to manage a spec file in the spell? GCC folks did not
comment on that one, but neither does the install manual mention that one has
to hack spec files for standar behaviour (or I'm blind at this time of night).
Well, I thought it'd be good to drop a query before going to sleep... let you
folks work something out while I can dream away;-)
Alrighty then,
Thomas.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] In what way is our gfortran install broken?,
Thomas Orgis, 06/29/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] In what way is our gfortran install broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] In what way is our gfortran install broken?, Thomas Orgis, 06/30/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] In what way is our gfortran install broken?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.