Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO
  • Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:03:14 +0100

On Tuesday 24 of February 2009 13:48:39 Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> :2009-02-24T07:41:flux:
> :
> > However, it was just an idea, and if nobody wants to run with it I don't
> > have a problem with that, as I'm not especially couched in the idea :) I
> > do agree that for trivial votes general developers should get binding
> > votes, but then we have an additional problem: defining what votes are
> > trivial and what votes are non-trivial.
>
> Why not just enable bug voting in bugzilla for such features and so on?
Because one user can assign more than one point and because you can't assign
negative points. Sure we could say the vote was succesful if the bug got 100
points in a week, but that doesn't tell us much about the votes (+100,
+200/-100, ...).

LP
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page