sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik <ruskie AT codemages.net>
- To: "sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:48:39 +0100 (CET)
:2009-02-24T07:41:flux:
> However, it was just an idea, and if nobody wants to run with it I don't
> have a problem with that, as I'm not especially couched in the idea :) I
> do agree that for trivial votes general developers should get binding
> votes, but then we have an additional problem: defining what votes are
> trivial and what votes are non-trivial.
Why not just enable bug voting in bugzilla for such features and so on?
--
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodies.
Ryle hira.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
George Sherwood, 02/23/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
Ladislav Hagara, 02/23/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
flux, 02/23/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
Jaka Kranjc, 02/24/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
flux, 02/24/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 02/24/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO, Jaka Kranjc, 02/24/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 02/24/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
flux, 02/24/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
Jaka Kranjc, 02/24/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
flux, 02/23/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
David Kowis, 02/23/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO, Remko van der Vossen, 02/24/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New x86_64 ISO,
Ladislav Hagara, 02/23/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.