sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?
- From: George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:41:20 -0600
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 09:52:53 -0600 (CST)
Kevin Monceaux <Kevin AT RawFedDogs.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, George Sherwood wrote:
>
> > TileHeight is declared in shear.c, so I am not sure what is going
> > on.
>
> After a lot of trial and error I think I've made a bit of progress.
> I discovered with with the exact same configure options I could build
> imagemagick successfully "by hand" but casting it failed. The only
> difference I could think of between the two was that I had ccache
> enabled in sorcery. I disabled ccache and was able to cast
> imagemagick successfully. I enabled/disabled it a couple of more
> times and each time the cast fails with ccache enabled, and succeeds
> with ccache disabled. Are there any ccache gurus around that know why
> ccache might cause such a compile failure?
>
I don't know what might be causing it, but I will disable CCACHE in
imagemagick for now. I confirmed that it does fail with CCACHE and am
confirming the fix now.
George Sherwood
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?,
Kevin Monceaux, 11/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?,
flux, 11/04/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?, Kevin Monceaux, 11/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?,
George Sherwood, 11/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?,
Kevin Monceaux, 11/05/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?, George Sherwood, 11/05/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/05/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?, George Sherwood, 11/05/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?, Kevin Monceaux, 11/05/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?,
Kevin Monceaux, 11/05/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?, George Sherwood, 11/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Subtle header file problem on boxes installed from 0.10.0-test4?,
flux, 11/04/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.