sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:59:49 -0700
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 20:58:48 +0200
Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net> wrote:
> I also don't like alpha versions and stuff in spells, even if it's
> only test grimoire, as it's not guaranteed that those spells will be
> updated to final before they're cut for stable-rc. And I don't like
> using pre versions in general.
> For big stuff like the gnome update, I think creating a devel branch
> for the -rc that can be deleted once it's merged into test is the
> correct solution. The policy for other changes to the spells while
> they're updated in a devel branch should imo be: "if you change a
> spell in this section during the devel branch cycle, you're
> responsible for also merging that change into the devel branch (of
> course merging version updates so that the -rc version stays in)".
> That way, people keep out of those sections in test in general, and
> if they really care about a fix, they have to make sure the final
> merge won't generate more conflicts than absolutely necessary.
> Does this seem reasonable to you all?
I concur, branches are your, and our, friend. =)
> Supporting devel versions for the gnome stuff inside the spells is
> madness imho, because all of them have to use either release or devel
> version consistently, or stuff breaks. This is really too much work
> for not much benefit.
I like having the option, think it should be up to the one doing the
work if they want to have a switch between devel/stable. ;)
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?,
Vlad Glagolev, 09/07/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?,
Robin Cook, 09/07/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?,
Arjan Bouter, 09/08/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 09/09/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?, Eric Sandall, 09/10/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 09/09/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?, Eric Sandall, 09/08/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?,
Arjan Bouter, 09/08/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We don't wanna cast the broken things, do we?,
Robin Cook, 09/07/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.