sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Dale E. Edmons" <demaillists AT comcast.net>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] castfs
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:01:05 -0700
Thomas Orgis wrote:
Am Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:03:54 -0700Yeah I like the idea behind castfs. It has quite a good design appeal. I'm still getting up on the code and some of the "intents" behind the design, but mostly it seems straight-forward.
schrieb "Dale E. Edmons" <demaillists AT comcast.net>:
I'd also be interested to know how many people are already using
castfs. I presume we intend to make this the default in the future?
I want castfs. I don't have it on all my installs, but I have used it already.
I think that such encapsulation for any package's "make install" is
absolutely mandatory.
I really want it to be the default and to work with all spells.
Also, with castfs, my long-term project of getting proper account support alsofor casting into (to-be) chroots will be piece of cake;-)
I've already got one simple bugfix. But really, the biggest part will be to
So, please, please work on it. I'm most thankful.
come up with a design document that'll decide what the expected behavior(s)
should be.
-
[SM-Discuss] castfs,
Dale E. Edmons, 03/18/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] castfs,
Thomas Orgis, 03/19/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] castfs, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 03/19/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] castfs, Dale E. Edmons, 03/20/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] castfs, Alexander Tsamutali, 03/19/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] castfs, Jaka Kranjc, 03/19/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] castfs,
Thomas Orgis, 03/19/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.