Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On Jan 03, Jaka Kranjc [lynx AT mages.ath.cx] wrote:
> On Thursday 03 of January 2008 18:01:34 Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > > A sad result. More harrasment will be needed next time (shows emrys was
> > > busy).
> >
> > Well, I will gladly accept responsibilty for the balls I did drop (like
> > scheduling it in the first place or announcing results), but I've never
> > seen prodding people to vote as something that should really rest with the
> > PL (or anyone but the individual voter).  Our leads are responsible for at
> > least keeping up with the list enough to know when votes occur, in my
> > opinion.
> I fully agree on that. We didn't invent our Developer policy just for 
> entertainment. It also defines some "harrasment" for repeated non-voters.

They get removed.  I think I didn't send the mail out because I first
wanted to do the math and see if anyone was going to be removed over this.
Failing on that is of course my problem.