Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>]

On Thursday 03 of January 2008 18:01:34 Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > A sad result. More harrasment will be needed next time (shows emrys was
> > busy).
>
> Well, I will gladly accept responsibilty for the balls I did drop (like
> scheduling it in the first place or announcing results), but I've never
> seen prodding people to vote as something that should really rest with the
> PL (or anyone but the individual voter).  Our leads are responsible for at
> least keeping up with the list enough to know when votes occur, in my
> opinion.
I fully agree on that. We didn't invent our Developer policy just for 
entertainment. It also defines some "harrasment" for repeated non-voters.

I mentioned the prodding since I remember you bugging people on irc to vote, 
but that has nothing to do with you as a project lead, but as the vote 
holder. Andraž did the same courteous thing when he was holding a vote iirc.
The list is low traffic enough that this shouldn't be needed though.

-- 
We cannot command nature except by obeying her.  --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.