sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:34:00 +0100
I agree, but I just wanted to hear some more opinions first.
I ran this on test and committed the result:
find -name "*.gpg" |
while read kr; do
gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring $kr --refresh-keys;
gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring $kr --list-keys |
grep -o "/[^ ]*" | cut -d/ -f2 |
xargs -I I -- gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring $kr --edit-key I clean
save;
done
It refreshed all the keys in all the keyrings then cleaned them up (removed
unusable signatures and more). Crosscertification was done automatically it
seems, that code alone fixed findutils. I didn't check any of the others.
If nothing is wrong, I'll run it over other grimoires once I get back home.
LP; Happy Holidays!
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
[SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Jaka Kranjc, 12/21/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Eric Sandall, 12/21/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Jaka Kranjc, 12/23/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter, Jaka Kranjc, 12/28/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Jaka Kranjc, 12/23/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Eric Sandall, 12/21/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.