sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:24:21 +0200
On Monday 16 of April 2007 06:13:31 David Brown wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Jeremy Blosser <jblosser AT firinn.org> wrote:
> > On Apr 15, Jeremy Blosser [jblosser AT firinn.org] wrote:
> > > On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:34, David Brown wrote:
> > > > I'd love to get stable-rc out the door this weekend but no one is
> > > > around to do the git thing to make it work.
> > > >
> > > > Bug 13330 is fixed with a blanket swap of -Os with -O2 and that was
> > > > the only bug that I saw gating.
> > > >
> > > > Other than doing all the git stuff and making tarballs I don't see
> > > > why stable 0.9 can't get out the door this weekend.
> > > >
> > > > For those who care.
> > > >
> > > > - David Brown
> > >
> > > I'll be home in an hour or so, I can do it then.
> >
> > Well, no, because I'm not sure what's supposed to be going on with bug
> > 13330. I see there was a lot of IRC chatter about that today and then
> > that commit was made and from the comments above and in the bug I think
> > you meant to request it be integrated to -rc-0.9, but I'm not sure
> > because none of the version or flags are set on the bug to request
> > integration.
>
> agreed, I'd like to see something from those that had the problems but
> apparently they are too busy with other things, I can roll back the
> change until something happens to try and fix the bug but there just
> isn't any work being done with it.
Just revert and close it as WORKSFORME. Timothée nicely said it: "I consider
this as an entry to be closed without wasting more time."
And yes, something like a NEEDMOREINFO status would be helpful.
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpphYZf0Ga80.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
David Brown, 04/15/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/15/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/15/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
David Brown, 04/16/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?, Jaka Kranjc, 04/16/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/16/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?, Eric Sandall, 04/16/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/16/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
Eric Sandall, 04/16/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
David Brown, 04/16/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/15/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Stable-rc 0.9 ready?,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/15/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.