sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT t.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:04:24 -0600
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 07:05:54AM -0800, seth AT swoolley.homeip.net wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:46:02AM -0600, Andrew Stitt wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:12:40PM -0600, Andrew Stitt wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:04:47PM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > > > On Friday 02 February 2007 07:00:23 seth AT swoolley.homeip.net wrote:
> > > > > We've got some more spells that need testers listed here:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://wiki.sourcemage.org/Stable-0.7
> > > > >
> > > > > And note that there's not a chroot yet. If you can volunteer for
> > > > > that,
> > > > > note your name in the table specifically for it. Also drop an
> > > > > email to
> > > > > the list about it, your timeline, etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Seth
> > >
> > >
> > > cat << EOF | sed -e s/6/7/ -e s/5/6/
> > > >
> > > > The plan for the chroot is to just update the stable-0.5 to
> > > > stable-0.6 and
> > > > re-tar it, correct? I can do that Saturday, if no one beats me to it.
> > > EOF
> >
> > Actually, no, you're correct, it should be updated to current stable,
> > which is 0.6. You were right. Sorry for the confusion. The *testing* is
> > 0.6 to 0.7. Maybe we should include publishing an upgraded chroot in
> > the release process?
>
> Probably when we're confident that things are near where we expect them,
> we should do that. If there really is something wrong with the upgrade,
> we probably don't need to be publishing the wrongness, but it could be
> good just to let people double-check things are how they expect them to
> be.
>
If something is wrong with the upgrade we shouldn't have released the
stable grimoire. Therefore it makes sense to do it before rather than
after. Also, thats pretty much what the release process already
qualifies as we test upgrades of every spell in basesystem. My point is,
through testing we basically get the next chroot for free.
-Andrew
-
[SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
seth, 02/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Eric Sandall, 02/02/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Andrew Stitt, 02/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Andrew Stitt, 02/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
seth, 02/03/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers, Andrew, 02/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
seth, 02/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Andrew Stitt, 02/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Andrew Stitt, 02/03/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Eric Sandall, 02/04/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Jeremy Blosser, 02/04/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Eric Sandall, 02/04/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers, Eric Sandall, 02/05/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Eric Sandall, 02/04/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Eric Sandall, 02/06/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/06/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers, Eric Sandall, 02/06/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers, Eric Sandall, 02/06/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers, Jeremy Blosser, 02/06/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/06/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Jeremy Blosser, 02/04/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers, Jeremy Blosser, 02/04/2007
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] testing chroot for 0.7 and testing volunteers,
Eric Sandall, 02/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.