sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Pol Vinogradov <vin.public AT gmail.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Pale web presence
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 05:14:09 +0500
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:19:56 +0500
"Alexander Tsamutali" <astsmtl AT gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok. I think everyone agrees with me that a good web site is crucial
> for such big and serious project as Source Mage. Now we have Drupal as
> the CMS for the main site and moinmoin for wiki. Drupal provides news,
> forum, blogs, polls and a way to organise documentation (drupal
> books). Drupal also provides us with some crappy private messaging
> system. Hmmm... i'll return to this topic later. So for Drupal:
>
> * news - almost no news on our site and DW
> * forum - low volume, but sometimes new users here get support here
> * blogs - some users and developers use it
> * polls - oh, polls show how many active users we have :(
> * some docs are already here and some on the wiki, do we have some
> policy on docs?
>
> About wiki, i like wikis and i like moinmoin. Currently our wiki is
> somewhat chaotic, but i think if we organise it better it will play a
> very important role. I can try to reorganise wiki. Sort pages in
> categories, create some home page. But we all must remember that the
> thing about wiki is _collaboration_!
>
> The most important tasks:
>
> * defining some process for publishing regular news, weekly news and
> define which news should go to DW (releases, important R&D such as
> castfs)
> * documentation, assemble and publish official documentation on
> drupal, write more docs
>
i'd like to add a section for new users/visitors with direct links to our
installation docs, features descriptions (Differences with Gentoo, smgl
specific docs, etc...). imho it'll be good for newcomers to have convenience
way of learning new distribution, won't it? and of course all docs must be up
to date ;)
and why syndicate was removed? it's a lovely thing rather than Changes to
test...
all above is imho :)
public
Attachment:
pgposIqJFGw6x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Pale web presence,
Alexander Tsamutali, 01/01/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Pale web presence, Pol Vinogradov, 01/01/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.