Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

Alexander Tsamutali wrote:
>> Perhaps leave the GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER for future use, and add a
>> NS-PLUGIN provider and use that for packages that provide Netscape
>> plug-in functionality.
> I want to hear more opinions here. I'm not sure that we need
> GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER because i don't know spell which depend on
> _some_ graphical browser.

Flash comes to mind, mplayerplug-in as well. There are probably others.

> Another question is the name of new
> provider:
> NS-PLUGIN-COMPATIBLE
> NS-COMPATIBLE
> NS-PLUGIN
> Which is better?

NS-PLUGIN is shorter and provides enough information with the name, IMO.

-sandalle

-- 
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/