sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends...
- From: "Alexander Tsamutali" <astsmtl AT gmail.com>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends...
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:06:31 +0500
Perhaps leave the GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER for future use, and add aI want to hear more opinions here. I'm not sure that we need
NS-PLUGIN provider and use that for packages that provide Netscape
plug-in functionality.
GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER because i don't know spell which depend on
_some_ graphical browser. Another question is the name of new
provider:
NS-PLUGIN-COMPATIBLE
NS-COMPATIBLE
NS-PLUGIN
Which is better?
--
Alexander Tsamutali
-
[SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends...,
Alexander Tsamutali, 11/08/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends..., Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 11/08/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends...,
Eric Sandall, 11/08/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends...,
Alexander Tsamutali, 11/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends...,
Eric Sandall, 11/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends..., Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 11/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends...,
Alexander Tsamutali, 11/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends..., Alexander Tsamutali, 11/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends...,
Eric Sandall, 11/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends...,
Alexander Tsamutali, 11/09/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GRAPHICAL-WEB-BROWSER and friends..., Geoffrey Derber, 11/20/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.