sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:33:10 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> No hits on the ledger. I couldn't find anything either, so I agree with the
> possible removal.
I'm simply going to point out that relying on the ledger to determine
usage of a spell is flawed. That's not an official count or anything. I
don't feel that it should be used as a "Should we do something" proof.
- --
David Kowis
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Cauldron Component Lead |
| SourceMage GNU/Linux -- www.sourcemage.org |
| |
| Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying |
| to find easier ways to do something. - Robert Heinlein |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)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=La73
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Jaka Kranjc, 07/29/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal, Mathieu L., 07/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
David Kowis, 07/29/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal, Matthew Clark, 07/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
seth, 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
seth, 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/31/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/31/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
seth, 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Jaka Kranjc, 07/29/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.