sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: seth AT swoolley.homeip.net
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:28:46 -0700
google works well, I'm the second link:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=fags-0.2.1.tar.gz&btnG=Search
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:26:59PM -0700, seth AT swoolley.homeip.net wrote:
> This is where I moved everything for the new mirror algorithm for devel
> sorcery.
>
> swoolley.org/source_cache/fags-0.2.1.tar.gz
>
> Seth
>
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 04:09:31PM +0200, Mathieu L. wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While trying to rework the fags spell, I've found out that not only the
> > webpage url is dead, (http://www.tty0.org/page/fags/) but also that
> > if you try to summon the sources
> > (http://www.tty0.org/page/fags/fags-0.2.1.tar.gz) you won't get a valid
> > tarball.
> > Then I tried to get some more info about it on the net, to see if there
> > was an alternative repos or something like that but to no avail.
> >
> > So for the moment I think it's not worth the trouble of working on the
> > spell and I'm even pondering on removing the spell as I don't think
> > many ppl use it.
> >
> > What do you all think please?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mathieu
> >
> > --
> > If a function be advertised to return an error code in the event of
> > difficulties, thou shalt check for that code, yea, even though the
> > checks triple the size of thy code and produce aches in thy typing
> > fingers, for if thou thinkest "it cannot happen to me," the gods shall
> > surely punish thee for thy arrogance.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Jaka Kranjc, 07/29/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal, Mathieu L., 07/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
David Kowis, 07/29/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal, Matthew Clark, 07/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
seth, 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
seth, 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/31/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/31/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Mathieu L., 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
seth, 07/30/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal,
Jaka Kranjc, 07/29/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.