Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:32:07AM +0200, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> > <snip> 
> 
> > Of course the problem with this is it only lets certain
> > spells list an individual maintainer and probably raises again the 
> > question
> > of how spells should really be organized.
> <snip>
> 
> Oh, please raise the question... ;-) Yesterday again I was asking myself
> metaphysical questions such as "why a spell goes in graphics-libs
> instead of x11-libs", things like that... ;-)
> 
> Just a word about that, is still planned to do something after we chose
> our new SCM, or is it planned to be post 1.0 ?

We'll check it again when we have a final decision on the SCM.
Depending on the SCM, some way of organizing spells may be more or less
good for storage/history. E.g. in git, moving complete spells around
shouldn't be a problem at all, as files and their location are seperate
entities.

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz                              Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
                                                    http://www.sourcemage.org