Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
  • To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular
  • Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:10:29 -0400

Eric Sandall wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andraž "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
>> Eric Sandall wrote :
>>
>>> The proper bit(s) of xorg-modular should conflict with xorg/xfree86/etc.
>>>
>> It's still in testing, plans are in motion to put it all in into
>> devel and test end of june.
>>
>> a) x11-libs-dummy - PROVIDER of common X11-LIBS
>> c) x11-utils-dummy - PROVIDER for X11-UTILS
>> d) xorg spell get's changed into a profile that casts
>> X11-LIBS and X11-SERVER and X11-UTILS
>>
>> Any conflicts will be in there. And techincaly they don't confilct
>> as they don't install the files in the same place.
>>
>>> My machine looks like it's bored, so I'll have it install xorg-modular
>>> today. ;)
>>>
>> Have fun ;)
>
> So the packages that already conflict with xorg (xorg-app-profile,
> xorg-driver-profile, xorg-proto-profile, xorg-data-profile,
> xorg-font-profile, xorg-libs-profile, and xorg-util-profile) are all the
> conflicts needed (on xorg-modular's end, anyways)?
>
> - -sandalle

I have some spells written up for xcb (which will be used underneath
xlib in sorg 7.2), they depend on stuff in xorg-modular and it might be
a good home for them.

Jeremy




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page