Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular
  • Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:04:51 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andraž "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
> Eric Sandall wrote :
>
>> The proper bit(s) of xorg-modular should conflict with xorg/xfree86/etc.
>>
> It's still in testing, plans are in motion to put it all in into
> devel and test end of june.
>
> a) x11-libs-dummy - PROVIDER of common X11-LIBS
> c) x11-utils-dummy - PROVIDER for X11-UTILS
> d) xorg spell get's changed into a profile that casts
> X11-LIBS and X11-SERVER and X11-UTILS
>
> Any conflicts will be in there. And techincaly they don't confilct
> as they don't install the files in the same place.
>
>> My machine looks like it's bored, so I'll have it install xorg-modular
>> today. ;)
>>
> Have fun ;)

So the packages that already conflict with xorg (xorg-app-profile,
xorg-driver-profile, xorg-proto-profile, xorg-data-profile,
xorg-font-profile, xorg-libs-profile, and xorg-util-profile) are all the
conflicts needed (on xorg-modular's end, anyways)?

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEc1zTHXt9dKjv3WERAqGaAKCIuFofyHaQb1M+aoW3G0Cx5bnQ/wCdFbvb
XgyA5b4ydWwR2xRn4BmTTUA=
=Hz27
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page