sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] PERFORCE change 77309 by Juuso Alasuutari for review
- From: Juuso Alasuutari <iuso AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] PERFORCE change 77309 by Juuso Alasuutari for review
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:17:19 +0300
On Thursday 06 April 2006 13:00, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > ==== //sgl/grimoires/devel/kde-core/kdebase/HISTORY#35 (text) ====
> >
> > @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
> > +2006-04-06 Juuso Alasuutari <iuso AT sourcemage.org>
> > + * volatiles: Added /usr/share/config/kdm/*, finish off bug
> > + #10585
> > + * REPAIR^none^volatiles: Added
>
> This REPAIR file will only work for the people who didn't have kdebase
> installed with the previous volatiles. Since you changed the current
> volatiles instead of adding a new one, this should be
> REPAIR^MD5^volatiles, with MD5 being the md5sum of the _old_ volatiles
> file.
If I rename REPAIR^none^volatiles to REPAIR^<md5sum>^volatiles, will also
those users have their tablet updated whose volatiles is older than that?
Isn't that kind of repair specific to just that particular volatiles file
whose md5sum it has? Should I also keep REPAIR^none?
Juuso
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] PERFORCE change 77309 by Juuso Alasuutari for review,
Juuso Alasuutari, 04/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] PERFORCE change 77309 by Juuso Alasuutari for review, Juuso Alasuutari, 04/06/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.