sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Pieter Lenaerts <pieter.lenaerts AT telenet.be>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:11:15 +0100
Op wo, 01-02-2006 te 16:53 -0800, schreef Eric Sandall:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > Download verification failure (hash or signature) definitely need to be
> > fixed before we move stable-rc to stable. Compile problems should be
> > fixed. Other bugs might be delayable unless they're regressions from the
> > current stable.
> > If no one disagrees with that categorization I'll move all bugs that
> > need to be fixed according to that to milestone 0.3 so we have a clear
> > view what's still to be done.
I think we should keep versions with serious runtime errors out of there
too. imho there is no difference between a compile error and a runtime
error from the user's point of view and stable is all about usability if
you ask me
--
Pieter Lenaerts
Smidsestraat 121
9000 Gent
tel. +32485189222
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Eric Sandall, 02/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Pieter Lenaerts, 02/02/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Pieter Lenaerts, 02/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Eric Sandall, 02/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.