sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 19:57:53 +0100
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:34:58PM +0100, Karsten Behrmann wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Prodding this thread... I'd really like to get 0.9.6-rc1 out end of this
> week, so could we maybe try to get together and fast-track what needs
> to be done?
The full list of bugs filed against stable rc is here:
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Codex&version=stable-rc&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
Download verification failure (hash or signature) definitely need to be
fixed before we move stable-rc to stable. Compile problems should be
fixed. Other bugs might be delayable unless they're regressions from the
current stable.
If no one disagrees with that categorization I'll move all bugs that
need to be fixed according to that to milestone 0.3 so we have a clear
view what's still to be done.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Karsten Behrmann, 02/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Eric Sandall, 02/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Pieter Lenaerts, 02/02/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Pieter Lenaerts, 02/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Eric Sandall, 02/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] next stable and stable-rc??,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.