sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:09:05 -0800 (PST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Maurizio Boriani wrote:
On 2006-01-10 07:04:54 +0100 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> wrote:
Could you try it with default_build and see if all goes well? I'd say
try to use default_build and make sure that all works, but if not then
use /usr/share/GNUStep (IMO).
If all agree I propose /opt/GNUStep becouse a 'suggestion' in openstep
standard specification 3.0 (which refer to /usr/GNUStep or
/opt/GNUStep).
Let me know and I'll update whatever is needed (+ default doc install
choose to n)
According to the FHS[0]:
The directories /opt/bin, /opt/doc, /opt/include, /opt/info, /opt/lib,
and /opt/man are reserved for local system administrator use. Packages
may provide "front-end" files intended to be placed in (by linking or
copying) these reserved directories by the local system administrator,
but must function normally in the absence of these reserved
directories.
But:
Distributions may install software in /opt, but must not modify or
delete software installed by the local system administrator without
the assent of the local system administrator.
The minor restrictions on distributions using /opt are necessary
because conflicts are possible between distribution-installed and
locally-installed software, especially in the case of fixed pathnames
found in some binary software.
So we, SMGL, /may/ install packages to opt. ;) I'd prefer to not use
/opt, but if the only viable options are: 1) abusing /usr or 2) using
/opt, I'd prefer #2.
- -sandalle
[0] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-3.12.html
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDw/hFHXt9dKjv3WERAnL6AKCu3Uh5UKWCCw60UnjD+BHQ0cMuwQCdE/Hv
kig2JRgw3FLAdtLLjVBXsg0=
=ajYX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/08/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/08/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Maurizio Boriani, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Maurizio Boriani, 01/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance, Arwed von Merkatz, 01/10/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance, Maurizio Boriani, 01/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Maurizio Boriani, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Maurizio Boriani, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Eric Sandall, 01/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GNUStep and FHS compliance,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 01/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.