sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed
- From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
- To: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:35:00 -0800
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:11:14PM +0100, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I had to "cast -r -c net-tools". Moreover I had to change processor
> >> setting from x86_64 to x86_32 due to net-tools.
> >>
> > FYI, x86_32 is the proper setting for 32-bit mode for this processor
> > with a 32-bit iso. x86_64 would require a 64-bit toolchain. If the
> > archspecs were not clear, I can and should modify them. :)
> >
>
>
> I just thought smgl-devel-x86-2.6.13-nptl-2005120321.iso was created
> with 64-bit toolchain. My fault.
> BTW, new archspecs, nvidia_driver spell needs some fix. Its version was
> changed to 32 due to new archspecs.
>
> # gaze version nvidia_driver
> Grimoire Section Spell Grimoire Version Installed Version
> -------- ------- ----- ---------------- -----------------
> z-rejected z-kernels nvidia_driver 32 1.0-7676-pkg1
Yep, I noticed that :) I changed the archspec format (but only in
devel/test), but that messed with three spells in z-rejected. I don't
have an nvidia card to fix it with. The other two spells with problems
are j2sdk{,-bin}. When we fix z-rejected spells we should probably
integrate the new archspecs to stable at the exact same time (or we
should version z-rejected).
Seth
--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Quality Assurance Team Leader & Security Team: Source Mage GNU/linux
Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic http://www.sourcemage.org
Key id 63C1E02F = E07A FB0E 5925 CE4A 6526 2AD5 1782 FEC2 63C1 E02F
Attachment:
pgp17hejsOdBC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed,
Karsten Behrmann, 12/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed,
Ladislav Hagara, 12/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed,
Seth Alan Woolley, 12/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed,
Ladislav Hagara, 12/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed,
Seth Alan Woolley, 12/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed, Andrew, 12/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed, Eric Sandall, 12/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed,
Seth Alan Woolley, 12/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed,
Ladislav Hagara, 12/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed,
Seth Alan Woolley, 12/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] 0.9.6 ISO release deadline near - testers needed,
Ladislav Hagara, 12/05/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.