Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>]

Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote :

> They mostly are designed to produce HTML, but not exclusively, so I'd
> object to putting any such things into http section.
> In reality, template engines are not the worst of it, so the question is
> probably this: what's the difference between `libs' and `devel'
> sections, and how does one determine which one of those two "last
> resorts" to choose if none of the other sections fit?
> And a little sub-question :-): isn't it time for a separate Python
> section? It would be a good place for many a spell from devel, libs,
> http, and maybe others.
> 
> Sergey.
> 
> Eric Sandall wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> We have smarty in php-pear, clearsilver in devel, cheetah in libs, and
> >> maybe more. What's a good section for template engines?
> >
> >
> > Since those are generally specific to a language I would say keep/put
> > them in the section associated with their 'language' (e.g. php, perl,
> > or http for 'generic').
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> 
> 

I think it would be a good time tostart a separate ruby section as well...
But then the questions comes who will maintain it... 

-- 
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru

Key id = 9A5117F8
Key fingerprint = 6731 FEF2 99A8 4672 5962  69AB 3DAF DA67 9A51 17F8