sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] template engines
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:54:27 -0500
They mostly are designed to produce HTML, but not exclusively, so I'd object to putting any such things into http section.
In reality, template engines are not the worst of it, so the question is probably this: what's the difference between `libs' and `devel' sections, and how does one determine which one of those two "last resorts" to choose if none of the other sections fit?
And a little sub-question :-): isn't it time for a separate Python section? It would be a good place for many a spell from devel, libs, http, and maybe others.
Sergey.
Eric Sandall wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
We have smarty in php-pear, clearsilver in devel, cheetah in libs, and
maybe more. What's a good section for template engines?
Since those are generally specific to a language I would say keep/put
them in the section associated with their 'language' (e.g. php, perl,
or http for 'generic').
-
[SM-Discuss] template engines,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] template engines,
Eric Sandall, 11/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] template engines,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] template engines, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 11/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] template engines,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/23/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] template engines,
Eric Sandall, 11/23/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.