Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome 2.12/dbus/hal/cairo integration

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome 2.12/dbus/hal/cairo integration
  • Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:19:43 -0500

Okay, will do.

CuZnDragon
Robin Cook

On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 17:55 +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 07:25:55PM +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > sadly enough, I didn't have the time to deal with that stuff as fast as
> > I expected, so here's a call for comments.
> > GNOME 2.12 has been working fine in devel for quite some time now, but
> > it's held back from test integration because of the (api-incompatible)
> > upgrades of dbus, hal and cairo it requires.
> > Here's the list again, all of those are optional_depends or
> > functionality enabled by CONFIGURE options:
> > cairo breaks: possibly mozillas cairo svg renderer, no one has tested
> > that yet
> > dbus breaks: gnugadu2, bluez-utils, rhythmbox
> > hal breaks: k3b, kdebase
> >
> > I don't think any of the functionality enabled by those options is
> > important enough to hold back the GNOME and gtk 2.8 integration into
> > test any longer. If no one objects those optional_depends will be
> > disabled shortly until upstream makes their code work with the new hal,
> > dbus and cairo.
>
> Ok, I didn't have time to do this before leaving anymore, so everyone
> who wants to help is free to fix/remove these optional_depends. Robin,
> could you please watch this and integrate the gnome 2 upgrade once all
> of the above is done?
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page