Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On Aug 30, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> > Quoting "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>:
> >
> >> I'm sure most people are really tired of this thread before it even
> >> started, so I really want to bring my responses to a close.  If you have
> >> things you think there is value in continuing to discuss, I'm willing to
> >> keep talking, but otherwise we should probably agree to end this soon and
> >> see if other project members have input.
> >
> > Just tell me signatures are not mandatory and it's over.
> 
> Or you could come to understand that GPG can be used for more than the
> one purpose you seem to think it's only capable of.
> 
> I'm for moving completely to GPG keys, but that's just me. The other
> Leads and developers get to weigh in as well.

All the leads that have spoken up appear to be in favor.  We haven't heard
from Arwed yet, which is significant.  Are any other developers opposed?
Please say something if you are...

Attachment: pgp10jukg0req.pgp
Description: PGP signature