sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:35:32 +0200
The individual keys would still be binaries...so we'd now have lots of
little binaries instead of one big one?
If big keyring is changed it is very difficult to check what was changed.
How many keys was changed?
How many keys was added/removed (intentionally/unintentionally)?
If one individual key is changed it is easy to check for example really there is a new maintainer of wget.
--
lace
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Arwed von Merkatz, 08/19/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?,
Ladislav Hagara, 08/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Eric Sandall, 08/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Ladislav Hagara, 08/21/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?, Andrew, 08/21/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.