Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Flavien Bridault <f.bridault AT fra.net>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?
  • Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:46:42 +0200

Hi all,

Now that I become to understand the GPG checking process for spells, I
noticed, if I understood well ;-), that you have to include a keyring in
the spell when using a vendor key. That means, referring to a real
example, that there is a kernel.gpg keyring in the udev spell and the
same kernel.gpg keyring in the linux spell.
Is it not a big problem in the design ? For me, anything redundant is
bad, and as I heard on IRC "Yes we should resolve that later", I rather
like to point out this now, in order to avoid later mass changes of
spells using GPG checking.

If I'm right (that's finally the question), I will obviously post a
bug. ;-)

Feel free to send me flames if I again said bullshits. ^_^
--
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
Flavien Bridault
Source Mage GNU/Linux - Disk Section Guru

irc: vlaaad
jabber: vlaaad AT amessage.be

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page