Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jason Flatt <jflatt AT sourcemage.org>]

On Wednesday 17 August 2005 09:39 am, Eric Sandall wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
> > Not sure if this is true or not(from a comment on GrokLaw):
> >> As to another poster's thoughts earlier about DistroWatch, if you were
> >> listed on DistroWatch prior to Aug 2004, then the fee is $0.
>
> They're probably referring to http://linuxmark.org/fees.html:
> ----
> For Profit/Other Tier 1
> [This is a "grandfather clause" for written sublicenses executed prior
> to August 1, 2004]
> Annual Fee = $0
> ----
>
> That would depend on the definition of 'written sublicense'.
>
> -sandalle

They're going to grandfather for profit entities, but not non-profit 
entities?  
That doesn't make any sense.  How would Source Mage be classified, since it 
is technically neither a profit nor a non-profit entity?

-- 
Jason Flatt
Source Mage GNU/Linux: Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic.
http://www.sourcemage.org/
jflatt AT sourcemage.org

Attachment: pgpcGCcgCa443.pgp
Description: PGP signature