Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>]

Karsten Behrmann wrote :

> PGP verify signed message
> gpg: Signature made sob 16 jul 2005 21:30:34 CEST using DSA key ID 83B7BF2C
> gpg: Good signature from "Karsten Behrmann <karstenbeh AT web.de>"
> gpg:                 aka "Karsten Behrmann (BearPerson/Sourcemage)
> <BearPerson AT gmx.net>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the 
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 4249 3C63 01ED 258E 3225  7247 024B 0A2E 83B7 BF2C
> PGP verification success
> 
> 
> Hi all!
> I was just thinking that sometime in the not-too-far future, there comes
> the time when we'll have automated generation of devel ISOs (a 
> not-too-trivial
> process), which can carry several points of failure (spells, scripts,
> problems in the chroot). Also, prometheus will have failures to report.
> So I'd call for a seperate mailing list for such trouble reports from
> automated "factory" servers. Name propositions have been
> SM-daemons
> SM-factory
> SM-dump
> Comments, questions, ridicule?
> So Far,
>   Karsten
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> 
> 

Hmmm ok... seems a bit much...
We might as well just have a single -devel ML for commits and this in one...
Else I'd go with SM-auto[mation]

-- 
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru

http://ruskie.dtdm.org/blog/