sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Subversion client no more
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:26:26 -0700
Quoting "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>:
> All,
>
> I would like to make both Apache module compilation and Berkeley DB optional
> for
> the `subversion' spell and phase out `subversion-client' spell. With minimum
> options, it would build Subversion command-line client, svnserve, and fsfs
> backend, because these cannot be disabled. Berkeley DB option would add
> another
> backend, and HTTPD option would create the two Apache modules.
> Effectively, subversion and subversion-client spells would merge.
> Please let me know if you think it's not such a good idea.
> Thanks,
>
> Sergey.
I love the idea, as long as the clients are still fairly light compared to the
server and both can be compiled with apache2 installed. :)
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] Subversion client no more,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/28/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Subversion client no more, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 04/28/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Subversion client no more, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/28/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Subversion client no more, Eric Sandall, 04/28/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.