sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "David C. Haley" <dhaley AT tamsco.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:56:32 +0400
I would tend to agree with you in teh area that the ranking on teh board
doesn't denote a good or bad distro. I also thing that this will change in
time as we start making releases in teh future, eg. 1.0, etc.
They higher on the list you are, the more interested people are at why you
are number one adn hence, they click. Likewise, if you have releases,
updates, things of that nature that are always being posted in the news
section of distrowatch, people usually click to see what is going on, what's
now, etc.
Regards,
SilverS
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:21:27 +0200
Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz> wrote:
> Howdy all our users,
>
> just looking at DistroWatch.com and do not believe my eyes.
> Our rank is 92. I do not believe we have only 55 satisfied users, i.e.
> 55 hits per day (the average of last 6 month). The lists of last 3 and 1
> months are even without Source Mage.
> The best source based distro should be placed in the first half of the
> list. So please, if you use our distro, if you want to support us, visit
> once a day Distrowatch.com and click on the best source based distro:
> http://distrowatch.com/sourcemage
>
> I know the quality of distro does not depend on the rank on some list
> but certainly we can attract more new users if we stay in this list.
>
> --
> Ladislav Hagara
> Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> http://www.sourcemage.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
-
[SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Ladislav Hagara, 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Tanel Tammet, 04/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 04/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 04/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92, Jeremy Kolb, 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
David C. Haley, 04/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92, Andrew, 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Eric Sandall, 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Ladislav Hagara, 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Robert Helgesson, 04/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92, Eric Sandall, 04/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92, Eric Sandall, 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Robert Helgesson, 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Ladislav Hagara, 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Eric Sandall, 04/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Rank: 92,
Tanel Tammet, 04/27/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.