Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
  • To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
  • Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:01:29 -0800

The x86_64 archspec uses "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" in the HOST variable,
so it looks like we have it right according to google majority rule,
although I'll be happy to change it if it really should be pc instead.

-Andrew

On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:28:46AM -0500, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Actually, it's the other way round:
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 11,900
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu 3,590
> Just to get it straight...
>
> Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
>
> >Benoit and All,
> >
> >On x86_64 ISO, we have platform as x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Shouldn't
> >it be x86_64-pc-linux-gnu? Since I'm no expert in this, I used Google
> >and the former has 3,590 hits while the latter has 11,900... I'm
> >trying to rebuild gcc and g++ on AMD64 after new ISO install and an
> >obscure error started me thinking about this.
> >A bit of a good news though: Broadcom wireless card in my laptop works
> >with 64-bit Windows driver, ndiswrapper 1.1 and Linux 2.6.11.5, in 64
> >bits.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page