sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:28:46 -0500
Actually, it's the other way round:
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 11,900
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu 3,590
Just to get it straight...
Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
Benoit and All,
On x86_64 ISO, we have platform as x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Shouldn't it be x86_64-pc-linux-gnu? Since I'm no expert in this, I used Google and the former has 3,590 hits while the latter has 11,900... I'm trying to rebuild gcc and g++ on AMD64 after new ISO install and an obscure error started me thinking about this.
A bit of a good news though: Broadcom wireless card in my laptop works with 64-bit Windows driver, ndiswrapper 1.1 and Linux 2.6.11.5, in 64 bits.
-
[SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/28/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/28/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
Andrew, 03/28/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, sergey, 03/29/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
Andrew, 03/28/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu or x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/28/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.