sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues
- Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:56:53 -0500
It is available at http://dufflebunk.homeip.net/smgl/findLibDepends2.sh
Run: find LibDepends.sh [-n recursion] [-q] [spell [spell] ...]
Default recursion is 2, explicit depends only.
Default spell list is all installed spells.
Add -q to surpress the progress output.
I believe at one point Andrew took the logic from the script and put it
into prometheus, I'm not sure though.
It is fairly slow to run, a 'gaze from' is needed for every library each
elf in a spell needs. If two binaries need libfoo.so it will run gaze
from libfoo.so twice, so it's not very optimized.
On Fri, 2005-04-03 at 06:11 -0800, Jason Flatt wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2005 08:40 pm, Andrew wrote:
> >
> > This is part of what prometheus was good at. Dufflebunk also wrote a
> > script to inspect libraries and derive the 'real' depends for a spell,
> > then compare it with sorcery's idea of the depends and report any
> > differences. I dont think anyone uses it, but even having a dozen people
> > use it and report their findings would greatly enhance the dependency
> > information. Its often the case that theres "just enough" dependency
> > information for things to work, but not much more.
> >
> > -Andrew
>
> Where is that code and what is it called? If it's something I can start
> and
> let run in the background, I'd be happy to run it and post results.
>
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
David Braaten, 03/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Eric Sandall, 03/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Geoffrey Derber, 03/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues, Eric Sandall, 03/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Geoffrey Derber, 03/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Geoffrey Derber, 03/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Andrew, 03/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 03/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Jason Flatt, 03/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Paul Mahon, 03/06/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues, Jason Flatt, 03/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Paul Mahon, 03/06/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Andrew, 03/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Andrew, 03/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues, Eric Sandall, 03/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Geoffrey Derber, 03/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 03/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues, Geoffrey Derber, 03/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues, Eric Sandall, 03/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 03/04/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
David Braaten, 03/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues, Andrew, 03/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] sorcery rebuild issues,
Eric Sandall, 03/03/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.