Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>]

I have been finding that tetex, texinfo, and linuxdoc-tools keep getting 
messed up.

Once I recast them then spells that use them cast correctly also.

CuZnDragon
Robin Cook


On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:11 -0500, Jeremy Kolb wrote:
>Ladislav Hagara wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's my compile log for linux-pam. I tried disabling tetex and
>>> linux-doc (by saying n to it) and it still uses them. So that's
>>> probably a bug. I also recast the spells just in case. But here's my
>>> log. Anyone know what's going on?
>>>
>> 
>> I just tried it, seems all is OK.
>> 
>>  From your log:
>> /usr/bin/make -C doc all
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Linux-PAM-0.77/doc'
>> Building module text from files in modules/*.sgml
>> Processing file ../pam
>> 
>>  From my log:
>> /usr/bin/make -C doc all
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/Linux-PAM-0.77/doc'
>> Building module text from files in modules/*.sgml
>> XXX - you do not have the sgml2html binary installed
>> XXX - you do not have the sgml2html binary installed
>> 
>> So try to dispel `gaze from sgml2html`.
>> 
>> - lace -
>> _______________________________________________
>> SM-Discuss mailing list
>> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
>Thanks, it looks like dispelling linuxdoc-tools works.  I guess it's a 
>bug then that it ignores the option to NOT use linuxdoc-tools and tetex.
>
>Jeremy
>_______________________________________________
>SM-Discuss mailing list
>SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part