Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Social Contract Revision - Part I

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Social Contract Revision - Part I
  • Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:42:30 -0500

What about LGPL, BSD, etc... licenses? Are you sure none of the stuff we
need is under a non-GPL license?

On Thu, 2005-10-02 at 09:37 -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
<snip>
> We have other licenses in our grimoires and only binary-only and
> distribution-limiting licenses make it into z-rejected. If "distribution"
> only
> applies to our ISO, we still include non-GPL software (some drivers,
> packages,
> etc.) that are not GPL.
>
> Should we remove that line or reword it to say, "and all of the software
> required to use our distribution will be licensed under the GPL."?
>
> -sandalle
>
> [0] http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=SocialContract
>
> --
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page