Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>]

What about LGPL, BSD, etc... licenses? Are you sure none of the stuff we
need is under a non-GPL license?

On Thu, 2005-10-02 at 09:37 -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
<snip>
> We have other licenses in our grimoires and only binary-only and
> distribution-limiting licenses make it into z-rejected. If "distribution" 
> only
> applies to our ISO, we still include non-GPL software (some drivers, 
> packages,
> etc.) that are not GPL.
> 
> Should we remove that line or reword it to say, "and all of the software
> required to use our distribution will be licensed under the GPL."?
> 
> -sandalle
> 
> [0] http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=SocialContract
> 
> --
> Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
> http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part