sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:52:15 -0800
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:59:49PM -0800, Andrew wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:29:32AM -0800, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> > If you're going to do work on this, I think that we should make a
> > distinction between last compile and last update.
> >
> > With afrayedknot's new tablet support we can know the difference now and
> > head -n 1 the tablet history entry to get a real newer date.
> Well, theres no history per-se in the tablet, however things are stored
> based on the time their installation completed. So you could easily
> compare that timestamp with whenever the last system-update occurred.
I think I need to clarify:
spell imaginary-spell is added with version 1 in the distant past
spell imaginary-spell is updated with a security patch on day 1 to devel
on day 7 test grimoire is re-downloaded on computer-foo.
on day 7 imaginary-spell is recompiled via a sorcery rebuild
(or maybe an update from version 0)
spell imaginary-spell is updated on day 14 to test with security patch
***problem cause*** The UPDATED value is listed as "day 1"
on day 20, computer-foo is updated.
with UPDATED listed as day 1 on imaginary-spell and compile date is listed
as day 7, imaginary-spell's security update is not triggered for recompile
I'm just hoping for some way to avoid that. This also happens when
scribe update is run a time significantly before an update, not just
when we have lagged updates to the grimoire.
Seth
--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Key id EF10E21A = 36AD 8A92 8499 8439 E6A8 3724 D437 AF5D EF10 E21A
http://smgl.positivism.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEF10E21A
Security Team Leader Source Mage GNU/Linux http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgp0zkPjCYrrW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update, Andrew, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
neuron, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
neuron, 01/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update, Andrew, 01/20/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update, Ladislav Hagara, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
neuron, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Andrew, 01/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
neuron, 01/21/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update, Andrew, 01/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Andrew, 01/21/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update, Arwed von Merkatz, 01/21/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update, Seth Alan Woolley, 01/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Andrew, 01/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
Arwed von Merkatz, 01/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
neuron, 01/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Proposal: gaze newer last_update,
neuron, 01/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.