sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:54:01 -0500
I would have thought that the freetype people would have had a reason to
not automatically include the stuff... has anyone asked them?
On Fri, 2004-17-12 at 00:18 +0000, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know some of you have been hit by the "bug" where packages do not
> properly include freetype.h, and so it fails on line 20 of
> /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h, which says to have the
> program use:
> #include <ft2build.h>
> #include FT_FREETYPE_H
>
> I'd like to know if we should patch all the spells individually to
> properly include ft2build.h at the proper time or if we should modify
> freetype2 to just include ft2build.h at that point. I'm for the
> latter, which I've modified my headers to do for a while and it seems
> to work, as that would be less work, though perhaps not the "proper"
> fix.
>
> What do others think?
>
> -sandalle
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal,
Eric Sandall, 12/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal,
Eric Sandall, 12/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 12/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal,
Eric Sandall, 12/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal, Seth Alan Woolley, 12/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal,
Eric Sandall, 12/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 12/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal, Paul Mahon, 12/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] FreeType2 "fix" proposal,
Eric Sandall, 12/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.