sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:59:20 -0500
(I somehow missed the start of this thread)
The check_self just runs the standard --fix tests, and I don't think it
picks up on the Perl problems.
BTW, the cast stuff at the end of the perl FINAL will cause every single
spell in the perl section to be cast, not just the ones which are
already installed.
On Wed, 2004-01-12 at 10:15 -0800, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:13:00AM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > I've noticed that most perl modules need to be recompiled against a new
> > version
> > of perl. Shall all perl modules have an 'on_cast perl cast_self' or
> > 'on_cast
> > perl check_self' in a TRIGGERS file?
>
> Is check_self enough? I'd prefer that if it works generally.
>
> Seth
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates,
Eric Sandall, 12/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates,
Seth Alan Woolley, 12/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates,
Eric Sandall, 12/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates,
Arwed von Merkatz, 12/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates, Eric Sandall, 12/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates,
Arwed von Merkatz, 12/01/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates, Paul Mahon, 12/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates,
Eric Sandall, 12/01/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] perl modules and perl updates,
Seth Alan Woolley, 12/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.