Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] fcron

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] fcron
  • Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:43:44 -0700

On Thursday 08 July 2004 9:45 pm, Eric Womack wrote:
> I'm feeling this out first before filing a bug...
>
> At the end of the compile log for fcron I get:
>
> ----------
>
> ./script/boot-install "/bin/install -c -o root" /sbin 0 /var/spool/fcron 0
> . ./script/boot-install: line 57: test: : integer expression expected
>
> Fcron should be started by your init scripts.
> The installation process is going to try to install fcron in them.
>
> Note that if you answer no to a proposition made at this point by
> the installation script, it will try to propose another way to do it.
> (if there are several possibilities, a list will be printed before each
> action)
>
> If you answer no to all the propositions of the script, or if the script
> fails, a message will be printed telling you what you should do manually.
>
>
> The script proposes the following location to do it :
> /etc/init.d/fcron
>
>
> Installation process failed to install fcron in your init scripts :
> please do it manually.
>
> You should now stop the old version of fcron and start the new one.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/fcron-2.9.4'
>
> ----------
>
> Is this normal? The install does not fail, but fcron does not start.
>
> Ideas?

It looks like those lines are coming from the the supplied Makefile. I may
be
wrong, but it appears to be making a couple of invalid assumptions about
whether fcrontabs is installed or not and the system's installed init system.

The first part is a failed test when checking for an old version of
fcrontabs.
I think there is a previous test that should be failing and the code that is
causing the error you (and I) are getting should never even be run, but I
didn't investigate it that closely.

The remaining part is regarding the supplied init script. Since we are
supplying our own init script, that part is probably not hurting anything.

I suppose someone could clean up the Makefile for those two areas, but then
we
are modifying the author's source...

--
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT d(-) s+:- a>++++ C++$(+++) UL++++ P(+) L+++ E- W++ N+@ o? K? w-- O?
M-- V PS- PE+ Y+ PGP@ t 5+ X R tv--() b+@ DI+@ D+++ G e h---- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------



  • [SM-Discuss] fcron, Eric Womack, 07/09/2004
    • Re: [SM-Discuss] fcron, Jason Flatt, 07/09/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page