sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:44:02 -0700
Quoting Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>:
> That's how i'd like it to work, but it doesn't seem to be possible to
> split the actual compilers.
My bad then, I thought it was a complete split. :(
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Paul, 06/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Eric Sandall, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 06/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Paul, 06/30/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.